This year's macro-control has achieved remarkable results. The Chinese economy has gradually eliminated the pressure of overheating and entered a reasonable track. However, many private enterprises have also heard complaints: The results of this macro-control have somewhat limited the development of private enterprises. This argument seems quite supportive of arguments. Slightly scaled investments cannot be implemented because of monetary tightening; large-scale investment is further limited by banks and the government. The Iron Man incident had no need to say that even Liu Yongxing, who had always had a good relationship with the governments at all levels, suffered setbacks. His electrolytic aluminum project, which invested several hundred million yuan, was forced to run aground because it did not comply with national policies. But this judgment seems to be wrong. This is because government funds are basically no longer invested in competitive areas. Economists have turned their calls into government economic management concepts. Therefore, no matter from the attitude of the government leaders or from recently released policies, there is no way to restrict private enterprises. The meaning of development. We believe that the government will only continue to implement the rules of the game as the ruler and maintainer, and the government will not continue to fight for the people's interests. So, does the perception that private enterprises have some restrictions on their recent investment are wrong? correct. The recent investment is indeed not as smooth as it was a year ago. It is because the overheated investment that occurred in the previous phase requires a period of macro-control to intervene in order to prevent blind construction. Macro-control mainly focuses on the economic increment, which basically does not have a limiting effect on stocks. As a result, the economic stock has become a beneficiary of macro-control. China's economic stock is mainly in the hands of state-owned enterprises, and private enterprises are later entrants in most industrial fields. Therefore, the discrimination that private enterprises feel that they are subjected to is actually a superficial phenomenon. It is a phenomenon that has to be a last resort. It is definitely not the intention of the government. Private enterprises in the chemical industry have developed rapidly in recent years and have grown faster than private enterprises in other industries. The reason is that as a basic industry, the chemical industry has been stimulated by the overall rapid development of China's economy, and it has obtained more than average market demand. For the same reason, in the regulation of economic overheating, the pressure on the chemical industry is also greater than that of the general processing industry. This time, it is important to maintain confidence. First of all, we must believe in the government, believe in the necessity and rationality of macro-control, and secondly believe in our own future development. We must also be glad to avoid being trapped by the possibility of economic overheating. In the period of macro-control, it is time for private enterprises to accumulate energy and gain momentum. Intermittent investment period is the time for the company to take a short break to conduct market research, technical reserves, and improve internal management. The outbreak always appears after a brief silence. The time will not be too long. After the macro-control, the next opportunity for rapid development will come. The chemical industry will be the first to quickly recover. At that time, those who complained could only look at the opportunity and slip away. Companies that quietly and fully prepared to do so would be able to go forward and become unstoppable.
Package Press,Roll-To-Roll Printing Industry,Packaging Printing System,Professional Inkjet Printing
Shenzhen Textalk Graphic Technology Co.,Ltd , https://www.textalkdigital.com